[1]Wang, X. L. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. DOI:10.3102/0002831213488622

[2]Devine, A., Hill, F., Carey, E., & Szűcs, D. (2018). Cognitive and emotional math problems largely dissociate: prevalence of developmental dyscalculia and mathematics anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 431–444. DOI:10.1037/edu0000222

[3]Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508

[4]Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 147(2), 134–168. DOI:10.1037/bul0000307

[5]Buelow, M. T., & Barnhart, W. R. (2017). The influence of math anxiety, math performance, worry, and test anxiety on the Iowa gambling task and balloon analogue risk task. Assessment, 24(1), 127–137. DOI:10.1177/1073191115602554

[6]Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. DOI:10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

[7]Luo, R., Zhang, A., Wang, Y., Li, H., Xu, Y., Guo, K., & Si, J. (2024). Math attitudes and math anxiety predict students’ perception of teacher support in primary school, but not vice versa. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 6-21. DOI:10.1111/bjep.12628

[8]Zhao, J., & Qin, Y. (2021). Perceived teacher autonomy support and students’ deep learning: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of perceived peer support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 652796. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652796

[9]Choi, H., & Cho, S. (2021). The relationship between parental and teachers’ autonomy support, enjoyment, self-efficacy, academic effort and PAˆ· E class flow by middles school students participating in PˆA· E classes. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 32(2), 322–337. DOI:10.24985/kjss.2021.32.2.322

[10]Zhang, H., Sun, C., Liu, X., Gong, S., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Boys benefit more from teacher support: Effects of perceived teacher support on primary students’ creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100680. DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100680

[11]Wang, J., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Xu, L., Liu, Y., & Zhen, R. (2017). Teacher’s autonomy support and engagement in math: Multiple mediating roles of self-efficacy, intrinsic value, and boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1006. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01006

[12]Yang, Y. F., Li, G. Z., Su, Z. G., & Yuan, Y. (2021). Teacher’s emotional support and math performance: The chain mediating effect of academic self-efficacy and math behavioral engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 651608.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651608

[13]Hackett, G., & Betz, N. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/ mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261. DOI:10.2307/749515

[14]Arens, A. K., Frenzel, A. C., & Goetz, T. (2020). Self-concept and self-efficacy in math: Longitudinal interrelations and reciprocal linkages with achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(3), 615–633. DOI:10.1080/00220973.2020.1786347

[15]Macmull, M. S., & Ashkenazi, S. (2019). Math anxiety: The relationship between parenting style and math self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1721. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01721

[16]Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., Chu, F., Scofield, J. E., & Ferguson Hibbard, D. (2019). Sex differences in mathematics anxiety and attitudes: Concurrent and longitudinal relations to mathematical competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1447–1461. DOI:10.1037/edu0000355

[17]Arroyo-Barrigüete, J. L., Carabias-López, S., Borrás-Pala, F., & Martín-Antón, G. (2023). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: The case of a business school in Spain. SAGE Open, 13(2), 21582440231166922. DOI:10.1177/21582440231166922,

[18]Liu, X., Gong, S., Zhang, H., Yu, Q., & Zhou, Z. (2021). Perceived teacher support and creative self-efficacy: The mediating roles of autonomous motivation and achievement emotions in Chinese junior high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100752. DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100752

[19]Zhou, D., Liu, J., & Liu, J. (2020). The effect of problematic internet use on mathematics achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the role of teacher-student relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105372. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105372

[20]Zhu, H., Zhang, J., Li, H., Huang, B., Feng, H., Liu, C., & Si, J. (2024). Independent and joint effects of perceived teacher support and math self-efficacy on math achievement in primary school student: Variable-oriented and person-oriented analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102445 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102445

[21]Ching, B. H. H. (2017). Mathematics anxiety and working memory: longitudinal associations with mathematical performance in Chinese children. Contemporary educational psychology, 51, 99-113. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.006

[22]Li, H., Zhang, A., Zhang, M., Huang, B., Zhao, X., & Gao, J. (2021). Concurrent and longitudinal associations between parental educational involvement, teacher support, and math anxiety: the role of math learning involvement in elementary school children. Contemporary educational psychology, 66, 101984. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101984

[23]Košir, K., & Tement, S. (2014). Teacher–student relationship and academic achievement: A cross-lagged longitudinal study on three different age groups. European journal of psychology of education, 29, 409-428. DOI:10.1007/s10212-013-0205-2

[24]Oda, S., Konishi, C., Oba, T., Wong, T. K., Kong, X., & Onge-Shank, C. S. (2021). Students’ math self-concept, math anxiety, and math achievement: the moderating role of teacher support. Journal of Education and Development, 5(1), 45. 

[25]Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–26. DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008

[26]Yıldırım, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150–172. DOI:10.1080/00220973.2011.596855

[27]Wang, Z., Borriello, G. A., Oh, W., Lukowski, S., & Malanchini, M. (2021). Co-development of math anxiety, math self-concept, and math value in adolescence: The roles of parents and math teachers. Contemporary educational psychology, 67, 102016. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102016

[28]Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy in Changing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

[29]Zhang, J., Li, H., Zhang, M., Zhao, X., & Si, J. (2019). Relationships among perceived teacher support, math self-efficacy and mathematics achievement for primary school students: a moderated mediation model. Studies  of  Psychology  and  Behavior, 17(5), 644-651. 

[30]Wang, C., Xu, Q., & Fei, W. Q. (2024). The effect of student-perceived teacher support on math anxiety: chain mediation of teacher-student relationship and math self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1333012. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1333012

[31]Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and individual differences, 19(3), 355-365. DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009

[32]Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46. DOI:10.2307/749455

[33]Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583–597. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583

[34]Rebekić, A., Lončarić, Z., Petrović, S., & Marić, S. (2015). Pearson’s or Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient-Which One to Use? Poljoprivreda, 21(2), 47-54. DOI:10.18047/poljo.21.2.8

[35]Gan, Y., & Peng, J. (2024). Effects of teacher support on math engagement among Chinese college students: A mediated moderation model of math self-efficacy and intrinsic value. Children and Youth Services Review, 156. DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107369

[36]Gao, J., Zhang, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Do AI chatbot-integrated writing tasks influence writing self-efficacy and critical thinking ability? An exploratory study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100472. DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100472

[37]Li, Y., Chen, J., Zhou, H., Yuan, H., & Yang, R. (2023). Research on motivation and behavior of ChatGPT use in middle school students. International Journal of New Developments in Education, 5(19), 69-77.DOI:10.25236/ijnde.2023.051911

[38]Duan, M., Huang, X., Huang, B., & Li, Y. (2025). Opportunities, Challenges and Strategies for AI-Assisted Improvement of Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Case Study of Lingnan University in Hong Kong, China. Education Insights, 2(6), 168-181. 

[39]Li Y, Xie M. Navigating International Challenges of Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Synergy of Gen-AI and Human-Made Solutions. GBP Proc Ser. 2025;3:186-192. DOI:10.70088/cfsps136 

[40]Zheng, P., Li, Y., & He, Z. (2025). Research on the Construction of Mental Health Mechanism for College Students under the Orientation of Cultivating Positive Mental Qualities. Education Insights, 2(3), 1–12. DOI:10.70088/5ezhvw97

[41]Sun, Y., Ma, X., & Li, Y. (2024). The Path Exploration of We-Media Platform in Vocational Undergraduate Student Management in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Vocational Education, 13(06), 1983–1995. DOI:10.12677/ve.2024.136306

[42]Huang, B., Huang, X., Duan, M., & Li, Y. (2025). Challenges and Countermeasures in Post-Pandemic Teacher Performance Management: Insights from Public Universities in Hong Kong, China. GBP Proceedings Series, 6, 28-39. DOI:10.71222/rayy4027